Skip to content

The Universe Should Not Actually Exist, Scientists Say

One thing I notice as I read through the synopses of scientific papers today is that as we discover more things related to what we can actually observe, scientists are often saying, “this cannot be,” or “this is unexpected,” or “this flies in the face of everything we know about this topic.” I often go through these articles and highlight what scientists actually know versus what they think they know (but not this time). In this case, I will be the first to offer that scientists may not necessarily be able to create an experiment that could effectively mimic the supposed early environment of the universe. In this case, however, what they are able to do is create particles and their opposite antiparticles. It is actually a good experiment because it proves that if we create a particle we will also create and antiparticle. It confirms the Law of Conservation of Matter and Energy. It also confirms that something and its opposite (on a nuclear scale) will annihilate each other. So here we have a situation where there had to be a creation event. (Even secular scientists acknowledge there was a beginning to the universe.) The big problem for naturalists is that the physics prove over and over that only special creation is possible. God had to be in control and things had to be brought into existence in a special way – by His hand.



The Universe Should Not Actually Exist, Scientists Say



Hannah Osborne

The universe as we know it should not exist, scientists working at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, have said.


After performing the most precise experiments on antiprotons that have ever been carried out, researchers have discovered a symmetry in nature that they say just shouldn’t be possible.


One of the big questions about the universe is how the first matter formed after the Big Bang. Because particles and antiparticles annihilate one another when they come into contact, if there were exactly equal measures of both, the universe wouldn’t exist—at least not in the form we see it today. As such, there must be an imbalance between particles and antiparticles, even if it is only by the tiniest fraction.


But this is not the case. All experiments designed to find this asymmetry have come up blank. This is also true of the latest, which were recently carried out at CERN by an international team of researchers. The findings from the BASE (Baryon Antibaryon Symmetry Experiment) are published in the journal Nature.


“All of our observations find a complete symmetry between matter and antimatter, which is why the universe should not actually exist,” first author Christian Smorra, from Japan’s RIKEN institute, said in a statement.


In the study, researchers used antiprotons that had been isolated in 2015. The antiprotons were measured using the interaction of two traps that use electrical and magnetic fields to capture them. The team was able to measure the magnetic force of the antiproton to a level that is 350 times more precise than ever before.


If there was an imbalance between protons and antiprotons, this level of precision would be the best bet for finding it. “At its core, the question is whether the antiproton has the same magnetism as a proton,” said Stefan Ulmer, spokesperson of the BASE group. “This is the riddle we need to solve.”


“The measurement of antiprotons was extremely difficult and we had been working on it for 10 years. The final breakthrough came with the revolutionary idea of performing the measurement with two particles.”


After finding no asymmetry between particles and antiparticles, the researchers will now work to develop even higher-precision measurements of protons and antiprotons to improve on the latest findings. “An asymmetry must exist here somewhere but we simply do not understand where the difference is. What is the source of the symmetry break?” Smorra said.

Top Scroll To Top